Groups call for overhaul of federal chemical regulations
New research on toxic chemicals in low-cost children’s and adult jewelry found that more than half of the products containg high levels of hazardous chemicals. The Michigan Network for Children’s Environmental Health and the Ecology Center released the study today (March 13) at www.HealthyStuff.org.
Researchers tested for chemicals -- including lead, cadmium, arsenic, mercury, bromine and chlorine (PVC) – which have been linked in animal and some human studies to acute allergies and to long-term health impacts such as birth defects, impaired learning, liver toxicity, and cancer.
More than half (57 percent) of the products tested had a “high” level of concern due to the presence of one or more hazardous chemicals detected at high levels. Four products contained over 10 percent cadmium, a known carcinogen. Fifty percent contained lead, with over half of these containing more than 100 ppm of lead in one or more components, exceeding the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) limit of lead in children’s products.
“There is no excuse for jewelry, especially children’s jewelry, to be made with some of the most well-studied and dangerous substances on the planet,” said Jeff Gearhart, research director at the Ecology Center and founder of HealthyStuff.org. “We urge manufacturers to start replacing these chemicals with non-toxic substances immediately.”
Ninety-nine pieces of jewelry were tested from 14 different retailers, including: Ming 99 City, Burlington Coat Factory, Target, Big Lots, Claire's, Glitter, Forever 21, Walmart, H&M, Meijers, Kohl's, Justice, Icing and Hot Topic. Samples were predominantly collected from retailers in Michigan, along with five other states including Ohio, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York and Vermont.
HealthyStuff.org measured the presence of these chemicals with an X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyzer – a proven, accurate indicator of elements in products. Anyone concerned about these jewelry products can visit www.HealthyStuff.org and search by brand, jewelry type and chemical detected.
Highlights of study results:
Other chemicals analyzed include mercury and arsenic.
According to the CPSC, parents and caregivers should not allow young children to be given, or to play with, cheap metal jewelry, especially when unsupervised. The CPSC states that: “Swallowing, sucking on or chewing a metal charm or necklace could result in exposure to lead, cadmium or other heavy metals, which are known to be toxic at certain levels of exposure.”
In 2010, however, the CPSC declined to regulate cadmium in children’s products, and instead has supported an industry-developed voluntary standard. In response, and in the absence of federal leadership, six states have moved to regulate cadmium, including California, Connecticut, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota and Washington. Legislation to restrict cadmium in children’s products has been introduced in Michigan, but the legislature has failed to schedule a hearing for the bill (SB 764). Federally, a wave of consumer pressure is pushing a rewrite of the Toxics Substance Control Act (TSCA), the federal law that regulates chemicals in commerce. The TSCA reform bill, the Safe Chemicals Act (S. 847), was introduced by Senator Richard Lautenburg in 2011 and now has 15 co-sponsors.
"Toxic jewelry is a symptom of the complete failure of our federal chemical regulatory system,” said Alexis Blizman, legislative and policy director for the Michigan Network for Children’s Environmental Health. “Downstream companies like jewelry retailers, and downstream users like our children, will never be safe until we reform our chemicals laws to ensure products are safe before they arrive on store shelves.”
Since 2007 researchers at the Ecology Center have performed more than 20,000 tests on 7,000 consumer products, including pet products, vehicles, women's handbags, jewelry, back-to-school products, children's toys, building products and children's car seats.
Published on March 13, 2012